MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1950784896 · doi:10.1111/bij.12272

Secondary contact followed by gene flow between divergent mitochondrial lineages of a widespread Neotropical songbird (<i>Zonotrichia capensis</i>)

2014· article· en· W1950784896 on OpenAlexaff
Leonardo Campagna, Cecilia Kopuchian, Pablo L. Tubaro, Stephen C. Lougheed

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Journal of the Linnean Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica
KeywordsBiologyGene flowLineage (genetic)Genetic admixtureSongbirdPhylogeographyMitochondrial DNAEvolutionary biologyGenetic divergenceRange (aeronautics)Hybrid zoneZoologyEcologyPhylogenetic treeGenetic variationGenetic diversityGeneGeneticsPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding how genetic and phenotypic differences that arise in geographically isolated populations influence the outcome of secondary contact advances our knowledge of speciation. In the present study, we investigate the secondary contact between divergent lineages of a widespread Neotropical songbird, the Rufous-collared sparrow (Zonotrichia capensis). Zonotrichia capensis is morphologically and behaviourally diverse, and shows a pattern of lineage diversification produced by a Pleistocene expansion and colonization of South America from a probable Central American origin. Consistent with previous results, we find three lineages throughout the species range, showing between 1.5% and 2.5% divergence in mitochondrial control region sequences. These lineages come into secondary contact in the Dominican Republic, La Paz (Bolivia), and North-eastern Argentina. We use DNA microsatellite data to study a broad secondary contact zone in North-eastern Argentina, finding that Bayesian clustering analyses do not assign individuals to their respective mitochondrial lineages. Overall, we did not observe nuclear genetic discontinuities in the study area. We conclude that, if genetic, morphological, and/or cultural differences accumulated among lineages during isolation, they were insufficient to prevent gene flow after secondary contact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological Journal of the Linnean SocietySame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207