Expression and Regulation of Metallothioneins in the Rat Epididymis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metallothioneins (MTs) are cytosolic proteins involved in cellular stress responses. The objectives of this study were to determine which epididymal cells express MTs, how they are regulated, and whether mRNA levels for 3 MT isoforms (MT I, MT II, and MT III) are modulated by heavy metals. MT expression was noted mainly in basal cells of all epididymal regions but not in all basal cells of any given region. MT I mRNA levels were highest in the testis, followed by levels in the corpus, cauda epididymidis, liver (positive control), caput epididymidis, initial segment, seminal vesicles, and ventral prostate. MT II mRNA levels were also highest in testis, followed by levels in the cauda, corpus, liver, caput, and initial segment, but they were undetectable in the seminal vesicles and ventral prostate. MT III mRNA levels were highest in the caput followed by testis and initial segment. Orchidectomy and orchidectomy with testosterone replacement experiments showed that immunoreactive MT in all epididymal segments was androgen dependent. Epididymal MT I mRNA levels were dependent on androgens in all segments except the corpus. MT II mRNA levels were androgen dependent only in the initial segment and corpus. MT III mRNA levels in the initial segment were not altered by orchidectomy but increased significantly in testosterone-treated rats. In the caput, MT III mRNA levels decreased following orchidectomy, but control levels were maintained by testosterone. In cadmium-injected rats, MT I mRNA levels were significantly increased in the testis and initial segment, but there were no effects in the liver and other epididymal regions. MT II mRNA levels were increased by more than eightfold in the liver and by three- to fourfold in the initial segment and caput. In the corpus, MT II mRNA levels were decreased by cadmium treatment. MT III mRNA levels were unaltered by cadmium treatment. In conclusion, all 3 MT transcripts are present in high abundance in the epididymis. Furthermore, MT is expressed mainly in basal cells with regulation by testosterone. Heavy metal induction appears to affect the proximal regions of the epididymis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".