MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigating the anionic phospholipid regulation of diacylglycerol kinase epsilon

2009· article· en· W195092339 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Lung, Matthew K. Topham, Richard M. Epand

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsDiacylglycerol kinasePhosphatidic acidGene isoformSecond messenger systemChemistryPhospholipidBiochemistryKinasePhosphorylationCell biologyBiologyProtein kinase CSignal transductionMembraneGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mammalian diacylglycerol kinases (DGKs) form critical links in cell signaling pathways by catalyzing the phosphorylation of diacylglycerol (DAG) to phosphatidic acid (PA); regulating the levels of these two essential second messengers in the cell. The epsilon isoform of DGK (DGKε), possesses the simplest primary structure of any DGK isoform, yet is unique in its inhibition by anionic phospholipids such as PA. The molecular mechanisms underlying this unique feature of DGKε are unknown. Here we show that there is a combined acyl chain specificity in the PA inhibition of DGKε, favouring a combination of an arachidonyl sn ‐2 and a stearoyl sn ‐1 acyl chain. These results contrast to those of previous reports in which an arachidonyl‐DAG specific isoform of DGK did not exhibit PA acyl chain specific inhibition. Also, deletion of DGKε's cationic cluster retains its PA acyl chain specific inhibition, a region previously hypothesized as a candidate for PA binding. Overall, these results suggest that the PA acyl chain specific inhibition of DGKε occurs through a binding site within DGKε with a definite shape that is not found in DGKε's cationic cluster. This work is funded by NSERC and the NIH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingFrench-language works237,207