An Inventory of Pedagogical Considerations for Interactive Television1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes several multi-point interactive television conferences that have taken place in British Columbia using a fibre optics telephone network developed by BC Tel, Ubiquity. The Ubiquity network connects Victoria and the Vancouver area to cities in the Southern Interior and Northern regions of the province. These early experiences with interactive television are analyzed in terms of pedagogical styles and considerations related to particular types of interaction afforded among conference participants. This work is part of a research project that is investigating the development and use of interactive television in the Faculty of Education at Simon Fraser University (SFU). The project aims to augment campus-based components and remote sites of SFU's teacher education program with experiences in schools throughout the province. Cet article decrit plusieurs conferences televisees interactives multipoint qui se sont deroulees en Colombie-Britannique au moyen d'un reseau telephonique par fibres optiques, concu par la compagnie de telephone de la C.-B. et appele Ubiquity. Le reseau Ubiquity relie Victoria et la region de Vancouver a plusieurs villes dans les regions interieures de la province. On y analyse ces premieres experiences de television interactive a la lumiere de leurs styles pedagogiques et des facteurs lies a certains types d'interaction auxquels ont eu acces les participants aux conferences. Il s'agit d'un travail effectue dans le cadre d'un projet de recherche sur le developpement et l'utilisation de la television interactive a la faculte d'education de l'Universite Simon Fraser (SFU). L'objectif du projet etait d'accroitre, sur le campus et sur les sites eloignes, les composantes du programme de formation des enseignants de l'Universite Simon Fraser, par des experiences « studio » faites dans les ecoles, partout dans la province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".