Extended supramolecular [3×3] Mn<sub>9</sub> grid arrays organized by Ag(I) and Au(III) — structural and magnetic properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A square [3×3] Mn(II) 9 supramolecular grid complex with appended ligand SEt groups provides a focus for extended molecular organization through outer-sphere interactions with soft metal ions. Reactions with Ag(I) and Au(III) led to extended 3D arrays in complexes [Mn 9 (SEt2poap) 6 ]Ag 5.75 (CF 3 SO 3 ) 2 (NO 3 ) 9.75 (H 2 O) 18 (4), [Mn 9 (SEt2poap) 6 ][Ag(CN) 2 ] 2 [Ag 3 (CN) 5 ](OH) 2 (H 2 O) 18 (5), and [Mn 9 (SEt2poap-3H) 4 (SEt2poap-2H) 2 (AuCl 3 ) 4 ] (AuCl 4 ) 3.25 Cl 1.75 (H 2 O) 14 (6), involving Mn 9 [3×3] square grids with external Ag–S contacts, but with Au(III) extended organization resulting through Au–N ligand contacts only. Structural and magnetic properties are discussed. In the gold complex, magnetic and structural data revealed that Au(III) behaves as an oxidant, leading to oxidation of some corner Mn(II) sites in the grid to Mn(III). Intra-grid magnetic exchange is antiferromagnetic in all cases (J = −4.4 cm −1 (4), J = −5.0 cm −1 (5)), leading to noncompensation of spins because of the odd number of metal ions and low-spin ground states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".