<i>Retracted:</i>The Relationship between Perceived Tone at the Top and Earnings Quality*
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Retraction
- Reason
- Falsification/Fabrication of Data;Investigation by Company/Institution;Misconduct - Official Investigation(s) and/or Finding(s);Misconduct by Third Party;
- Date
- 12/1/2014 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- Yes
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Contemporary Accounting Research
- Topic
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Field
- Business, Management and Accounting
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- EarningsWrightAuditTone (literature)CitationLibrary scienceAccountingPsychologyManagementPolitical scienceHistoryArtLawEconomicsArt historyComputer scienceLiterature
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no