The Study of The Social Welfare Progress in China Rural Community（1950——2010）
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper is thought that the history logic of china rural community social welfare progress is from the limited community welfare system based on community economy to the socializational social welfare system ,and its practical circumstances is that the traditional rural community social welfare system is disintegrating and a creative rural community social welfare system is establishing. According to the conditions above, the paper put forward some constructive suggestions to establish the reasonable and valid social welfare system in rural community. Key words: Rural social welfare,The developing of social welfare,The system changing Resume L’auteur de cet article pense que le developpement du bien-ere social de la campagne de notre pays reside dans la transformation du systeme du bien-etre limite fonde sur la commue en systeme du bien-etre social socialise, et que la situation actuellle se traduit par la desintegration du systeme du bien-etre traditionnel de la campagne et la constitution d’un nouveau systeme. A partir de la transformation du systeme du bien-etre sociale de base, l’auteur propose des conseils constructifs en faveur de l’etablissement d’un systeme bu bien-etre de la campagne rationnel et efficace. Mots-cles: le bien-etre social de la campagne, le developpement du bien-etre social, la transformation du systeme 摘 要 本文認為我國農村社會福利發展是從以社隊為基礎的有限的社區福利體制向社會化的社會福利體制轉型，其現實境遇是傳統的農村社會福利體制遭遇解構和創新的農村社會福利體制正在建構之中，從這個基本的社會福利制度轉型的出發，本文對建立合理有效的農村社會福利體制提出若干建設性的建議 關鍵詞：農村社會福利；社會福利發展；制度轉型
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it