MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1952104512 · doi:10.1139/p11-153

The power series technique and detection of zero-group velocity Lamb waves in a functionally graded material plate

2012· article· en· W1952104512 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed Shili Bouhdima, Mouldi Zagrouba, Mohamed Hédi Ben Ghozlen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGroup velocityPhase velocityLamb wavesMaterial propertiesResonance (particle physics)Plane (geometry)Relaxation (psychology)AcousticsMechanicsWave propagationOpticsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a technique for measuring the variation of the material properties along the thickness in a functionally graded material (FGM) plate. To investigate the propagation behavior of Lamb waves in a thermal stress relaxation type FGM plate with material parameters that vary continuously along the thickness, the power series technique, which has been proved to have good convergence and high precision, is employed for theoretical derivations. The method exploits the resonance at the minimum frequency of the S1 - zero group velocity (ZGV) mode. At this minimum frequency (f0), the group velocity vanishes, whereas the phase velocity remains finite. The numerical results also reveal differences between the ZGV frequency in the FGM plate and the corresponding frequency in a homogenous plate. In terms of results, we find that the in-plane and out-plane displacements are different between Al-rich and Si-rich surfaces. The plots of the involved stresses within the plate are added to check the performed calculations. Besides, the study covers the sensitivity of S1-ZGV resonance frequency to the FGM character and any slight variation of the plate thickness. All these results give theoretical guidance not only for experimental measurement of material properties but also for nondestructive evaluation using an ultrasonic wave generation device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207