Bibliographic record
Abstract
Há várias evoluções paradoxais que marcam a paisagem cultural do Quebec no atual momento. Neste pequeno texto de argumentação, o autor, mais do que fundamentar seu ponto de vista sobre uma visão pessimista das coisas, apresenta o estado da complexificação cada vez maior do espaço cultural quebequense, dos processos de recomposição cultural que marcam os grupos de referência vivendo no Quebec, e da particularização do Quebec como espaço cultural no mundo. Paralelamente, ele adverte contra o uso desmedido da problemática da alteridade e de alguns de seus conceitos em moda: transculturalidade, mestiçagem, hibridação, crioulidade, etc. Finalmente, introduz o conceito de reatualização para pensar a questão da passagem ao futuro das coletividades à espera do difícil e delicado equilíbrio entre sua lembrança e seu devir.Résumé: Il est plusieurs évolutions paradoxales qui marquent le paysage culturel du Québec à l’heure actuelle. Dans ce petit texte d’argumentation, l’auteur, plutôt que de fonder son propos sur une vision pessimiste des choses, fait état de la complexification grandissante de l’espace culturel québécois, des processus de recomposition culturelle qui marquent les groupements par référence habitant le Québec, et de la particularisation du Québec comme espace culturel et culture globale dans le monde. Parallèlement, il met en garde contre l’usage sans mesure de la problématique de l’altérité et ses concepts ou notions les plus à la mode aujourd’hui: transculturalité, métissage, hybridité, créolité, etc. Enfin, il introduit le concept de réactualisation pour penser la question du passage à l’avenir des collectivités en proie à l’atteinte du difficile et délicat équilibre entre leur souvenir et leur devenir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".