MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W195497870 · doi:10.1007/0-306-48135-9_15

Photosynthetic Adjustment to Temperature

2006· book-chapter· en· W195497870 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotosynthesisPhotoinhibitionBiologyBotanyChloroplastRuBisCOPhotosynthetic capacityDegree of unsaturationBiophysicsPhotosystem IIChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The description of a general mechanism for photosynthetic adjustment to temperature that encompasses all autotrophic species is not possible for three principal reasons: (i) inherent genetic diversity, (ii) differential strategies in growth and development, and (iii) organisms respond to temperature changes rather than to absolute temperature. Thus, ‘high’ and ‘low’ temperature are relative terms and will differ for pyschrophilic, mesophilic and thermophilic organisms. However, given this complexity, some consensus regarding photosynthetic adjustment to temperature is emerging. At low temperature (0–10 °C), photosynthesis is constrained thermodynamically. This may be manifested by chloroplast phosphate limitation due to reduced rates of sucrose synthesis and/or source-sink limitations. In this case, rates of CO2 uptake and O2 evolution are regulated directly through metabolite accumulation (feedback inhibition) and photosynthetic control. Alternatively, feedback inhibition may be regulated indirectly through catabolite repression of photosynthetic genes. Although light may exacerbate susceptibility to photoinhibition at low temperature in many species, cold grown, chilling-tolerant plants exhibit increased capacity for carbohydrate synthesis at low temperature which alleviates phosphate limitation, supplies a cryoprotectant and results in higher photosynthetic capacity than warm-grown plants. However, photosynthetic adjustment in cold-grown higher plants and algae does not reflect adjustment to low temperature per se, but rather, changes in excitation pressure on PS II. In contrast, photosynthesis in chilling-sensitive plants is not only constrained thermodynamically by low temperature but is also severely inhibited developmentally. Through a comprehensive molecular genetic study, a direct link between photosynthetic temperature acclimation and thylakoid lipid unsaturation has been established in cyanobacteria. However, the evidence for such a link in algae and higher plants is still equivocal. PS I may be primary site for photoinhibition at low temperatures in some chilling-sensitive species. Furthermore, susceptibility to low temperature photoinhibition is reduced by altering the level of unsatruation of chloroplast lipids in chilling-sensitive transgenic tobacco plants. With respect to high temperature (35–50 °C ), the consensus is that thylakoid membrane stability limits photosynthetic performance. In contrast to low temperature, light protects against high temperature inhibition of photosynthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it