Increasing Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Salmonella typhi in Ontario, 2002–2007
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We reviewed the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of all isolates of Salmonella typhi in Ontario, Canada from January 2002 to December 2007. We identified a total of 381 unique cases over the 5-year period (50-73 cases per year). Of the 381 cases, 171 were female, 164 were male, and no gender was identified for 33 cases. Age of the patients ranged from less than 1 to 102 years of age (median age of 20 years). Although resistance patterns for ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, third generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime until May 2005 and ceftriaxone from June 2005 to present), and chloramphenicol remained stable, nalidixic acid resistance rose sharply between 2003 and 2005 and has remained at approximately 80% of isolates since 2005. The significant and sustained increase in nalidixic acid-resistant S. typhi suggests that ciprofloxacin should no longer be used as the drug of choice for the empiric treatment of typhoid fever in Ontario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".