MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1955422619 · doi:10.1029/2003wr002918

Forest harvesting impacts on the peak flow regime in the Columbia Mountains of southeastern British Columbia: An investigation using long‐term numerical modeling

2004· article· en· W1955422619 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Markus Schnorbus, Younes Alila

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceSnowmeltRange (aeronautics)Elevation (ballistics)Surface runoffStreamflowHydrology (agriculture)PreharvestDrainage basinMeteorologyMathematicsGeographyGeologySnowPostharvestEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical hydrologic simulation, in combination with synthetic weather generation, was used to assess the sensitivity of the peak flow regime for hourly, daily, and 7‐day discharge to hypothetical harvesting scenarios in Redfish Creek in southern British Columbia. Simulation was based on stationary vegetation cover, thus representing potential peak flow regime adjustments during the first few critical years following harvesting. The relative difference between preharvest and postharvest peak discharge quantiles (Δ Q T ), estimated by comparing GEV distributions fit to the simulated preharvest and postharvest annual maximum series, tended to increase with increasing harvest area; however, the relationship was strongly influenced by the elevation distribution of harvest blocks. Although rainfall was determined to be a factor in roughly three quarters of all peak discharge events, the flood frequency of Redfish Creek is fundamentally a function of the frequency structure of snowmelt runoff. Consequently, changes in runoff synchronization between various elevation bands largely drove the magnitude of Δ Q T , and the degree of increased synchronization was found to be greatest following harvesting above H60 (elevation above which lies 60% of basin area) and least following harvesting below H60. As a result, only harvesting schemes that incorporated cut blocks above H60 tended to generate significant (α = 0.05) Δ Q T for a wide range of return periods ( T ), regardless of discharge timescale. Significant Δ Q T ranged from 6 to 14% for hourly, 5 to 14% for daily, and 5 to 20% for 7‐day discharge in the range of 1.25 ≤ T ≤ 100 years. For a given scenario, hourly and daily Δ Q T showed little variation with T , suggesting that small and large discharge events responded similarly to forest harvesting. However, this apparent trend substantially overstates Δ Q T for the largest hourly and daily peak discharge events such that the relationship of Δ Q T to T is inconclusive for T > 30 years. For 7‐day discharge, Δ Q T increases with increasing T for 1.25 ≤ T ≤ 100 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207