Stabilization of iron arsenate solids by encapsulation with aluminum hydroxyl gels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Ferric arsenate solids in the form of scorodite ( FeAsO 4 · 2H 2 O ) particles are suitable carriers for immobilization of arsenic‐rich wastes. The stability of scorodite is, however, highly pH dependent (typically at 4≤ pH ≤7) and satisfactory only under oxic disposal conditions. In this work a new stabilization technology based on the concept of encapsulation with aluminum hydroxyl gels is investigated to enhance the stability of arsenical solids over a wider range of disposal conditions. RESULTS The encapsulation system investigated involves blending and short‐term ageing of synthetic scorodite particles with amorphous aluminum hydroxyl gels derived from partial hydrolysis of aluminum chloride or aluminum sulfate salts. Of the two gel types, the Al( SO 4 ) 1.5 ‐derived gel proved to be the most effective, even at the very low Al( III )/As(V) molar ratio of 0.1, apparently due to in situ development of protective aluminum hydroxide matrix and not as a simple adsorption sink for soluble arsenate species. CONCLUSION Arsenic release from the scorodite–aluminum hydroxyl gel composites was found to be drastically reduced with respect to gel‐free scorodite, making this system a very interesting candidate for further development as an effective hazardous material encapsulating material. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".