Viability selection on female fly finery in the wild
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Female ornaments have evolved in a few taxa in which females compete for access to important resources provided by their mates. However, the effects of these sexually selected traits on survival have not been studied. Elaborate leg-scale and/or abdominal ornaments are displayed by females of some Rhamphomyia dance flies (Diptera: Empididae) to flying males carrying prey gifts (females do not hunt). Previous analyses have shown significant sexual selection on these female traits. We studied viability selection on the traits by sampling the webs of two spider species and comparing prey R. longicauda females to survivors. We also investigated viability selection from one of the spiders over two seasons. We found that the direction of viability selection on R. longicauda from sticky Tetragnatha spider webs was consistent over two seasons. For abdominal ornaments the form of viability selection was positive and primarily directional (linear). Viability selection also favoured shorter tibiae but there was no significant selection on the size of residual tibial scale area. However, with the addition of dance fly kills from the non-sticky, leaf-covering webs of a Dictyna spider, abundant in only one of the seasons, the overall direction of viability selection favoured larger tibial ornaments. While noting that this viability selection on tibial scale ornaments may be a statistical artefact of the fewer traits in the two-predator analysis (abdominal structures were missing from most Dictyna prey), we suggest that simple differences in the natural history of selective agents causing mortality may partly explain the variation in whether sexual traits are under viability selection. Viability selection on ornamental traits may vary greatly between seasons with changes in the abundances of different natural enemies so that net directional selection on these traits over many generations may be weak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it