On Evolution of the Chinese College students’ Value Concept in New Period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Chinese Society changed greatly in the past twenty years. As one of the most sensitive groups, the Chinese college students are also changing their value concept according to the society, which is displayed in turn: authority vanished and self awakened; impulsion of reform and self disappointed; selfness of value tendency and pragmatism of value standard; concept multiplicity and reality, concrete. Economic development, cultural thoughts, educational reform and growing of Chinese college students are main factors impacting of Chinese college students’ value concept development. Three basic relationships must be disposed of in their value education: self and society, ideal and reality, spirit and material. Key words: reform and open, Chinese college students, value concept, evolution Resume: La societe chinoise a connu des changements importants dans les vingts dernieres annees. En tant qu’un des groupes les plus sensitifs, les etudiants changent leur conception de valeur suivant la societe, qui est presentee alternativement : l’autorite disparait et la conscience de soi se reveille ; l’impulsion de la reforme et la deception de soi-meme ; la tendance de valeur d’egoIsme et le standard de valeur de pragmatisme ; le concept de multiplicite et la realite concrete. Le developpement economique, les pensees culturelles, la reforme educative et l’augmentation du nombre des etudiants sont les facteurs principaux qui influencent le developpement de leur conception de valeur. Trois relations fondamentales doivent etre presentes dans leur education de valeur : le soi-meme et la societe ; l’ideal et la realite ; le spirituel et le materiel. Mots-Cles: reforme et ouverture ; etudiants chinois, conception de valeur, evolution
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".