Quality of life and functional status in systemic sclerosis compared to other rheumatic diseases.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical factors associated with disability and physical health in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) compared to psoriatic arthritis (PsA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and healthy controls. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with SSc, 82 with PsA, 74 with SLE, 42 with RA, and 60 controls were recruited from various rheumatology clinics and underwent physical examination, tender point count, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) assessments. RESULTS: SSc patients were younger and had shorter disease duration than the comparator groups. SSc patients with joint involvement had significantly poorer HAQ-DI scores than patients with PsA (1.43 vs 0.84; p < 0.05), and had higher visual analog scale pain scores than RA patients (1.37 vs 1.01; p < 0.05). The SF-36 Physical Component Summary and HAQ-DI score in SSc patients were adversely affected by joint involvement (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively), >or= 11 tender points (p < 0.01, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal (GI) involvement (p < 0.01, p < 0.01), and high skin score (p = 0.02, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Physical health relating to quality of life is adversely affected in patients with SSc. Disability is associated with the presence of >or= 11 tender points, a high skin score, and joint and GI involvement. Joint involvement in SSc is more disabling than joint involvement in PsA; and patients with SSc experience more severe pain than patients with RA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".