Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le caractère foisonnant des publications et la multiplicité des lieux de recherche sur la caricature du xixe siècle ont pour contrepartie son inscription dans une perspective diachronique bien établie par l’historiographie depuis une trentaine d’années, comme l’est aussi la définition du genre et de son registre d’expression. Après ce premier cadrage, l’article aborde les fonds de caricatures de « l’âge du papier » (Félix Vallotton) et les publications qui leur sont associées, dans un tour d’horizon français et international. Les thèses témoignent du caractère multidisciplinaire des recherches académiques. Les colloques et les expositions, souvent liés aux commémorations, sont importants pour le domaine. Les perspectives actuelles – l’histoire du corps et de sa déformation, l’intermédialité et la géopolitique de la caricature – s’affirment dans les revues spécialisées dans la caricature et l’humour, aujourd’hui bien diffusées par les sites Internet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".