MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1959471808 · doi:10.1109/vetec.1993.510949

Measurements and simulation of received signals in rooms and corridors at 900 MHz and in the 20-60 GHz band

2002· article· en· W1959471808 on OpenAlexaff
M. Lecours, Dominic Grenier, M. Baqarhi, Soumaya Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterMultipath propagationDiffractionRay tracing (physics)Transmission (telecommunications)SIGNAL (programming language)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionAcousticsPath lossOpticsDelay spreadComputer scienceUniform theory of diffractionPhysicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors discuss CW measurements and simulations of received signals in a room, in corridors, and around corners at 900 MHz and at three frequencies in the 20-60-GHz band, namely, 21.6, 37.2 and 59.6 GHz. Reported measurements include signal transmission with directional antennas in corridors and rooms and around corners with the transmitting station stationary and the receiving station moving autonomously along a fixed path. Ray tracing is used with good success to compare the measurements in corridors with the results of simulations taking into account the main reflections along floors, ceilings and walls. Knife edge diffraction and geometric theory of diffraction are used to explain results of diffraction by corners. Results pertaining to the simulation of signal transmissions at 900 MHz in a single room are presented. The results show, for a sample of transmitter-receiver localizations, the effect of the different multipath rays, from which certain general conclusions can be drawn for improved system design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelinglow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelinglow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207