Autoimmune fulminant liver failure in adults: Experience in a Japanese center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: After the establishment of the international criteria of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in 1999 and the recognition of acute onset AIH, the diagnosis of patients with fulminant type of AIH came to be made. We diagnosed autoimmune fulminant liver failure based on the criteria, and discussed the etiology of fulminant hepatitis (FH) and late onset hepatic failure (LOHF), and the characteristics of autoimmune fulminant liver failure. METHODS: We investigated the etiology of 95 consecutive adult patients with FH or LOHF admitted to our liver unit between 1990 and 2009. Clinical and biochemical features, therapies and outcomes were examined in patients with AIH after 2000. RESULTS: Of 95 patients, 85 were FH and 10 LOHF. The etiology was due to viral infections in 51.6% (hepatitis A virus in 7.4%, hepatitis B virus in 43.2% and hepatitis E virus in 1.1%), AIH in 15.8%, drug allergy-induced in 12.6%, and unknown causes in 20.0%. The rate of patients with AIH increased significantly between 2000 and 2009 compared to the rate between 1990 and 1999 (P = 0.002). In recovered patients with AIH without transplantation after 2000, coma grade was lower, alanine aminotransferase level, prothrombin time activity and alfa-fetoprotein level were higher than in the others with statistical significance. CONCLUSION: AIH is not a rare cause of FH and LOHF, and the number of patients with unknown causes would surely decrease in concert with the precise diagnosis of AIH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".