Gain-of-function of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 upon cleavage by apoptotic proteases: implications for apoptosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is an important mechanism for the maintenance of genomic integrity in response to DNA damage. The enzyme responsible for poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), has been implicated in two distinct modes of cell death induced by DNA damage, namely apoptosis and necrosis. During the execution phase of apoptosis, PARP-1 is specifically proteolyzed by caspases to produce an N-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD) and a C-terminal catalytic fragment. The functional consequence of this proteolytic event is not known. However, it has recently been shown that overactivation of full-length PARP-1 can result in energy depletion and necrosis in dying cells. Here, we investigate the molecular basis for the differential involvement of PARP-1 in these two types of cellular demise. We show that the C-terminal apoptotic fragment of PARP-1 loses its DNA-dependent catalytic activity upon cleavage with caspase 3. However, the N-terminal apoptotic fragment, retains a strong DNA-binding activity and totally inhibits the catalytic activity of uncleaved PARP-1. This dominant-negative behavior was confirmed and extended in cellular extracts where DNA repair was completely inhibited by nanomolar concentrations of the N-terminal fragment. Furthermore, overexpression of the apoptotic DBD in mouse fibroblast inhibits endogenous PARP-1 activity very efficiently in vivo, thereby confirming our biochemical observations. Taken together, these experiments indicate that the apoptotic DBD of PARP-1 acts cooperatively with the proteolytic inactivation of the enzyme to trans-inhibit NAD hydrolysis and to maintain the energy levels of the cell. These results are consistent with a model in which cleavage of PARP-1 promotes apoptosis by preventing DNA repair-induced survival and by blocking energy depletion-induced necrosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".