MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1960040976 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2012-0521

Fourier transform spectroscopy of the OD-bending band of CH<sub>3</sub>OD

2013· article· en· W1960040976 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
R. M. Lees, Li‐Hong Xu, Brant Billinghurst

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of SaskatchewanUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsWavenumberExcited stateFourier transformTorsion (gastropod)Ground stateAtomic physicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The infrared Fourier transform spectrum of the OD-bending fundamental band of the CH 3 OD isotopologue of methanol has been investigated and analyzed in the 745–945 cm −1 region. The OD-bend is of hybrid a–b type, with predominantly parallel a-type character plus a small admixture of perpendicular b-type structure. The K-structure in the central Q-branch region is unusually well resolved and shows substantial shading to higher wavenumber. Sub-bands have been assigned for the v t = 0 ground torsional state from K = 0 to 13 for both A and E torsional species, as well as a number of sub-bands in the v t = 1, 2 excited torsional states. Upper-state term values have been determined from the observations and fitted to J(J + 1) power-series expansions to explore the torsion–K-rotation energy structure of the excited OD-bending state. A simple Fourier model for the energy structure gives a wavenumber of 863.246 cm −1 for the v t = 0 origin of the OD-bending band. The K = 0 torsional (E − A) splitting of 2.456 cm −1 found for the v t = 0 OD bend is 5.6% smaller than that of the ground state, and would correspond to a 9.9 cm −1 increase in the torsional barrier height, V 3 , to a value of approximately 376.2 cm −1 if other parameters do not change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207