Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article est un rapport partiel d'une tude mene par l'auteure pendant trois ans (2002-2005), intitule Sources and Methodology of Theatre Research in the View of Scholars and Information Professionals, qui a permis de brosser un tableau de la recherche dans le domaine du thtre, du point de vue des chercheurs, des archivistes et des bibliothcaires des arts de la scne.Cette tude abordait, autant que le permettait l'chantillonage tabli, la diversit des intrts, des approches et des sources utiliss pour la recherche dans le domaine du thtre, le rle et les caractris tiques du travail des archivistes et des bibliothcaires dans ce contexte, et l'intraction entre ces deux groupes.Elle concluait que les chercheurs, les archivistes et les biblio thcaires des arts de la scne ont plusieurs points en commun, et que le travail qu'ils font fournit des outils importants pour aborder plusieurs points essentiels qui relvent des sciences de l'archivistique, telle que la prolifration des mdias et des sources dynamiques et interactives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it