MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1960449745 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22316

Kinetics of tocopherol degradation during the storage of wheat germ oil

2015· article· en· W1960449745 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Micaela Magariño, César Mateo, Susana M. Nolasco

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
KeywordsTocopherolChemistryGermReaction rate constantKineticsDegradation (telecommunications)HexaneChromatographyFood scienceVitamin EAnimal scienceBiochemistryAntioxidantBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tocopherol degradation in wheat germ oil was studied during storage at different temperatures. Two types of wheat germ were used: heat‐treated germ (HT) and raw germ (RG). The oil was extracted (Soxhlet, n‐hexane) and stored at 25 and 47 °C (82 days) and at ‐20 and 5 °C (600 days). Tocopherols were determined by HPLC. Total tocopherol, α‐tocopherol, and β‐tocopherol decreased following first‐order kinetics. At 25 and 47 °C, the values of the degradation rate constants for total tocopherol were 5.00 × 10−3 days−1 (RG), 3.00 × 10−3 days−1 (HT), and 5.37 ×10−2 days−1 (RG), 2.57 × 10−2 days−1 (HT), respectively, indicating an increase in tocopherol degradation rate with increasing temperature. The reaction rates of total tocopherol were similarly affected at 5 and −20 °C, with lower rate constants (4 × 10−4 and 2 × 10−4 days−1, respectively). α‐tocopherol degraded faster than β‐tocopherol, presenting higher rate constants. Low temperatures favour the preservation of tocopherols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFrench-language works237,207