MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1960607709 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.012501

Novel Search for Heavy<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:math>Mixing from the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>β</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>Decay of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>Confined in an Atom Trap

2003· article· lv· W1960607709 on OpenAlexaff
M. Trinczek, A. Gorelov, D. Melconian, W.P. Alford, D. J. Asgeirsson, D. Ashery, J. A. Behr, P. Bricault, J. M. D’Auria, J. Deutsch, J. Dilling, M. Dombsky, P. Dubé, Shane M. Eaton, J. Fingler, U. Giesen, S. Gu, O. Häusser, K. P. Jackson, B. Lee, J. Schmid, T. J. Stocki, T. B. Swanson, Wan Yan Wong

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFWestern UniversitySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutrinoPhysicsParticle physicsNuclear physicsMomentum (technical analysis)RecoilPositronElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new technique, full neutrino momentum reconstruction, is used to set limits on the admixture of heavy neutrinos into the electron neutrino. We measure coincidences between nuclear recoils and positrons from the beta decay of trapped radioactive atoms and deduce the neutrino momentum. A search for peaks in the reconstructed recoil time-of-flight spectrum as a function of positron energy is performed. The admixture upper limits range from 4 x 10(-3) to 2 x 10(-2) and are the best direct limits for neutrinos (as opposed to antineutrinos) for the mass region of 0.7 to 3.5 MeV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0080.006
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207