Visuospatial working memory deficits in remitted patients with bipolar disorder: susceptibility to the effects of GABAergic agonists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Visuospatial working memory (VSWM) deficit under high working memory (WM) load deserves further investigation as a potential trait marker for bipolar disorder (BPD). However, VSWM performances may depend on basic neurocognitive processes and are possibly compromised by neurocognitive effects of psychotropic medications. METHODS: A total of 32 remitted BPD patients and 39 healthy controls undertook parametric VSWM tasks and assessments for selective attention, sustained attention, psychomotor speed, mental flexibility, and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III full IQ. Using a multivariate model and trend analysis and controlling for other basic neurocognitive ability, the effects of mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, GABAergic agonists, and anticholinergics on VSWM performances were explored by post-hoc analysis comparing performances across WM loads between healthy controls and patients treated and not treated with a specific medication. RESULTS: Remitted BPD patients showed more pronounced performance declines in VSWM performances as WM loads increased, indicating inefficient VSWM processing. The VSWM deficits of remitted patients were independent of their impairments in attentional processes or psychomotor speed. Among the medications, only GABAergic agonists were associated with impaired VSWM performances. CONCLUSIONS: Remitted BPD patients had WM-load-dependent VSWM processing deficits after controlling for neurocognitive performances. As these deficits were associated with the use of GABAergic agonists, altered GABAergic neurotransmission might be involved with the underlying mechanisms of the impaired VSWM processing of BPD. Since GABAergic agonist use is often continued from the acute to the remitted phase in BPD and might potentially affect the functional recovery, clinicians should be aware of these neurocognitive side effects, even at low dosages. Close monitoring and timely discontinuation of GABAergic agonists is of utmost importance for clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".