MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1960820563

Determinação de cobre no sedimento do canal prolongamento da Av. Bento Gonçalves, como contribuinte para contaminação do canal São Gonçalo - Pelotas - RS

2012· article· pt· W1960820563 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eduarda Medran Rangel, Filipe Sousa dos Santos, John Felipe da Cruz Garcia, Pedro José Sanches Filho

Bibliographic record

VenueVII CONNEPI - Congresso Norte Nordeste de Pesquisa e Inovação · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pesquisa foi realizada no canal chamado de Canal Prolongamento da Av. Bento Goncalves. Localizado na Regiao Sul do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, no municipio de Pelotas, e um canal que inicialmente foi criado para fins de drenagem pluvial. Este desagua no Canal Sao Goncalo que esta interligando a Lagoa Mirim com a laguna dos Patos. Com o passar dos anos, o canal em questao vem recebendo direta e indiretamente residuos solidos e liquidos, contendo diferentes contaminantes, provocando alteracoes fisico-quimicas na agua e no sedimento. Devido o impacto ambiental que os residuos dispostos no canal podem causar e concentracao de metais que trazem junto a si esta pesquisa busca caracterizar as concentracoes de cobre a partir de amostras coletadas ao longo do percurso do Canal na regiao urbana de Pelotas. As amostras depois de obtidas foram armazenadas e logo analisadas de acordo com o exigido por cada metodo. Atraves dos resultados foi possivel verificar que todos o analito analisado encontra-se dentro do valores estimados pela resolucao CONAMA 344/04 niveis 1 e 2, Diretrizes para a identificacao de avaliacao e gestao de sedimentos contaminados no Ontario (D.O).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVII CONNEPI - Congresso Norte Nordeste de Pesquisa e InovaçãoSame topicHeavy metals in environmentFrench-language works237,207