La matérialité décadente et l'économie: entre la fascination et la ruse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decadent literature is characterized by numerous descriptions of material luxury, whether in decoration, clothing and trinkets. This treatment of materiality has generally been interpreted by critics as a literary refusal of the bourgeois world, which was seen to be obsessed with productive work. But the evolution of the bourgeoisie in the last decades of the 19th century leads to new types of consumption precisely based on the useless and the unnecessary. It must then be understood that the literary representation of luxury is in part influenced by the behavior of the rising haute bourgeoisie of the time. Therefore, the decadent materialism could be seen not as a transgressive figure, but as a figure of disengagement, strongly influenced by the social codes of its time. However, in the most interesting literary texts, the representation of beautiful objects is problematized, marked by negativity, the gift and the play on the decorative status of the text. This representation sets up the terms of a real economic counter-discourse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".