MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effect of Small-Scale Industry on Local Development Case Study: Karak Governorate

2011· article· en· W1961044940 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Salah T. Al-rawashdeh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal socioeconomic and cultural dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)BusinessLocal DevelopmentDescriptive statisticsEconomic growthRegional scienceGeographyEconomicsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study aimed at knowing the characteristics of Small– Scale Industries SSIs in the governorate of karak and its important role in local development, Analyzing the relationship between the characteristics of SSIs that include the nature of activity, financing and location and the local development as well as the effect of this sector on the local development of Karak.A statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) program was used for descriptive analysis. All SSIs were selected for the purpose of this study.The main findings indicate that there is a high level of characteristics importance for SSIs. Financing SSIs ranked in the 1st place and location in the 2nd place followed by nature of activity in the 3rd place. There is a significant effect of the characteristics of SSIs on local development in Karak Governorate. There is a significant effect of the nature of the activity and location of the firm on local development in Karak Governorate. But there is no significant effect of finance for SSIs on local development in Karak Governorate.This study has verified further research opportunities that could enrich the understanding of SSIs in the southern region of the kingdom. The paper provides some relevant recommendations to policy makers, development agencies, entrepreneurs, and SSIs managers to ascertain the appropriate strategy to improve the SSIs sector. Key words: SSIs; SMEs; Industry; Enterprises; Local development; Jordan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicGlobal socioeconomic and cultural dynamicsFrench-language works237,207