MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1961050436 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2014-0255

A theoretical investigation of the S<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> cation in the gas phase

2014· article· en· W1961050436 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wei Yu, Zunlue Zhu, Chuncai Cheng, Deheng Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryComplete active spaceAtomic physicsMultireference configuration interactionHamiltonian (control theory)Basis setValence (chemistry)Radiative transferPotential energyBound statePauli exclusion principleConfiguration interactionRelativistic quantum chemistryGround stateScalar (mathematics)PhysicsQuantum mechanicsComputational chemistryExcited stateDensity functional theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential energy curves (PECs) of 18 lowest energy Λ-S states of the S2+ cation have been calculated using the complete active space self-consistent field method followed by the internally contracted multireference configuration interaction approach with the Davidson modification. When spin−orbit coupling is computed using the Breit−Pauli Hamiltonian with the cc-pCVTZ basis set, the 18 Λ-S states split into 56 Ω components. To improve the quality of the PECs, core−valence correlation and scalar relativistic corrections are included. All PECs are extrapolated to the complete basis set limit. Based on the PECs obtained by the icMRCI+CV+DK+Q/(CBS-56) calculations, the spectroscopic parameters of 17 Λ-S bound states and 50 Ω bound states are obtained. The transitions (including the Franck−Condon factors and radiative lifetimes) from two low-lying states to the ground state are calculated for several low vibrational levels. Analyses show that the spectroscopic parameters reported here can be expected to be reliably predicted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207