MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1961084634 · doi:10.1242/jcs.113.19.3355a

Cellular microbiology: an integrated approach to understanding pathogenesis of infection

2000· article· en· W1961084634 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy J. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMicrobiologyCell and molecular biologySubject (documents)Computational biologyGeneticsLibrary sciencePlant developmentComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellular Microbiology by P. Cossart, P. Boquet, S. Normark and R. Rappuoli ASM Press (2000) pp. 392. ISBN 1–55581-157-4 $75.95 The term ‘cellular microbiology’ was coined by the editors of this book in 1996. Since then several volumes and journals addressing this subject have been produced and Cellular Microbiology is a valuable contribution to an exciting field. In studying the pathogenesis of infectious diseases it is clear that an understanding of the interaction between the host and the pathogen requires a knowledge of both and here we have an excellent source of information for the integrated study of microbiology and cell biology. The first two chapters are a useful general introduction to the two subject areas and will be particularly useful for scientists of the ‘opposite’ discipline i.e. microbiologists will find the cell biology section particularly useful and vice versa. The chapters then progress through the encounter of the pathogen with the eukaryotic cell, from the interactions occurring at the cell surface, the mechanisms of attachment and the interaction with the cell cytoskeleton, to the action of bacterial toxins and the consequences of these interactions. Although the book relates mainly to the interaction of bacteria with the host there are also many interesting discussions on parasites and some fungi. Later chapters describe the interaction of pathogens with the immune system, covering the use of bacterial products as tools in cell biology and describing some of the underlying methodology involved in cellular microbiology; there are also interesting chapters on Type III and Type IV secretion systems. As with any textbook in a rapidly expanding area there is a danger that the information contained will rapidly become dated. This may apply especially to the chapters on secretion systems which are the subject of intense research effort. The chapters are all relatively short and can be read as stand alone ‘mini-reviews’ of the area. This will be very useful for students studying these areas. Cellular Microbiology is very well written and readable. The contributors are all experts in their respective fields and manage to communicate a sense of excitement that will be particularly valuable for readers relatively new to the area. The appearance of the book is enhanced by high quality diagrams and colour plates and the inclusion of some nice electron micrographs. Summary boxes provide useful background information relevant to the area being discussed; selected readings at the end of each chapter provide a good starting point for those wishing to find further information; however, there is no extensive referencing in the text, which may be a problem for the more specialised reader. Overall, this is an excellent textbook. I am sure it will serve both as an essential teaching aid for undergraduate cellular microbiology courses (which are becoming increasingly common) as well as for graduate students and other researchers in this expanding area. The editors and contributors are to be congratulated on producing such a wide-ranging and readable book. I am sure it will both consolidate interest in the area as well as recruit new members to the group of people who are fascinated by the study of cellular microbiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cell ScienceSame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207