Synthesis, spectroscopic exploration, biocidal activities, and crystal structures of 3‐(3‐fluorophenyl)‐2‐phenylpropenoic acid and trimethyltin(IV) complex
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The ligand, 3‐(3‐fluorophenyl)‐2‐phenylpropenoic acid, [C 15 H 11 FO 2 ] ( I ) was prepared by reacting equimolar amount of phenyl acetic acid with 3‐fluorobenzaldehyde (1:1) using Perkin condensation method. The trimethyltin(IV) carboxylate, [Me 3 SnO 2 FH 10 C 15 ] ( II ) was synthesized by refluxing an equimolar (1:1) mixture of trimethyltin chloride and silver salt of the ligand acid, [C 15 H 10 FO 2 Ag] ( Ia ). The ligand and complex both were characterized by elemental analysis, IR, mass, 1 H NMR, and X‐ray crystallographic data. On the basis of 1 H NMR data, ( 2 J[ 117/119 Sn, 1 H] and CSnC bond angle), it is concluded that the environment around the tin atom in solution is tetrahedral. The Infrared spectroscopic results showed that trimethyltin(IV) derivative has 5‐coordinated polymeric structure with bridging carboxylate groups in the solid state, which has been confirmed by the X‐ray crystallographic data. The crystal of ligand acid ( I ) is triclinic with space group P bar1. However, the crystal of the complex ( II ) is monoclinic with space group C 2/c . The geometry around the tin atom is distorted trigonal bipyramid with O(1) and O(2) atoms in apical positions. The ligand ( I ) and complex ( II ) were also tested for their biocidal activities. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 15:398–406, 2004; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/hc.20032
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it