MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1961793383

A Modalidade de Pregão aplicada na racionalização dos custos das compras governamentais: O Caso da Prefeitura Municipal de Aquiraz no Ceará

2001· article· pt· W1961793383 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandre Sobreira Cialdini

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais do Congresso Brasileiro de Custos - ABC · 2001
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesWelfare economicsEconomicsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partir dos anos 80, paises como Australia, Canada, Nova Zelândia, Reino Unido e Dinamarca, bem como governos estaduais e locais nos Estados Unidos promoveram alteracoes significativas nos modelos orcamentarios , no objetivo da busca do equilibrio fiscal-financeiro – adotados com a finalidade de ajusta-los a um movimento maior de atribuicao de um carater mais gerencial ao processo decisorio e as acoes empreendidas no âmbito da esfera governamental. Mais recentemente, em 1993, foi promulgado pelo Congresso americano o Government Performance and Results act, o qual estabelece uma serie de procedimentos a serem adotados pelas agencias do governo federal, a partir de 1997, a fim de conferir forte dinâmica gerencial aos processos e sistemas de governo, com ampliacoes e apoiados em modelos orcamentarios que ofereca, por um lado, maior autonomia as agencias na gestao dos recursos publicos, por outro, maior comprometimento e responsabilidade pelos resultados das acoes empreendidas no controle de custos governamentais. Nesse contexto, o Brasil tem empreendido esforcos no sentido de adotar medidas para fortalecer a governanca e a introducao de procedimentos objetivando a racionalizacao dos custos nas compras governamentais. Assim , vale salientar dois instrumentos de significativa importância nesse processo, que sao a Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal ( Lei no 101, de 04 de maio de 2000) e a Medida Provisoria no 2.026, de 28 de julho de 2000, que instituiu o pregao, como modalidade de licitacao. Ambos mecanismos estabeleceram procedimentos para racionalizacao dos custos , a partir do processo de aquisicao de bens e servicos publicos. Atraves da descricao das experiencias referidas, buscar-se-a identificar os aspectos comuns destas tentativas de aperfeicoamento da gestao do processo de compras governamentais , identificando o custo-beneficio da nova modalidade de licitacao – o pregao. Faremos aqui uma exposicao , como estudo de caso, da experiencia ocorrida em Aquiraz , no Estado do Ceara.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnais do Congresso Brasileiro de Custos - ABCSame topicBusiness and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207