MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Globalization of English and English Language Policies in East Asia: a Comparative Perspective

2009· article· en· W1963054935 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qi Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLingua francaGlobalizationPolitical scienceEnglish as a lingua francaHumanitiesMainlandChinaEnglish languageSociologyLinguisticsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last decade has witnessed the ever rising realization of the significance of English, which triggered the booming concept of teaching English as an International Language (EIL). English as a lingua franca has been playing an important role in the whole world since the 1950s in the twentieth century. In order to compete with western rivals in the new century, East Asian countries and regions in the expanding circle of English have to respond positively to the globalization of English and make adjustments to their respective ELT policies. This paper tries to review the global spread of English and discusses world Englishes and varieties of English. Besides, it would also describe and analyze the corresponding English language policies in East Asian contexts through a comparative perspective. A description analysis of ELT policies in Japan, Korea, Chinese Taiwan and China’s Mainland would be presented. Key words: globalization; ELT policy; East Asia; comparative study Resume: La decennie derniere etait temoin de la realisation meme croissante de la signifiance de la langue anglaise, ce qui a declenche en plein essor le concept de l’enseignement de l’anglais comme une langue internationale.(EIL) L’anglais comme une lingua franca a joue un role important dans le monde depuis 1950s pendant le 21e siecle. Dans le but de rivaliser avec rivaux occidentaux pour le nouveau siecle, les pays et les regions asiatiques dans le cercle en expansion de la langue anglaise a a repondre positivement a la mondialisation de la langue anglaise et a mettre en ajustement leurs politiques respectives ELT. Cette memoire tente de revoir la diffusion mondiale de la langue anglaise et de discuter de l’anglais mondial et des varietes de l’anglais. D’ailleurs, elle decrira et analysera aussi la correspondance des politiques pour la langue anglaise dans le contextes des pays asiatiques par une perspective comparative. Une description et une analyse des politiques ELT au Japon, en Coree, a Taiwan et dans la Chine continentale sera presentee. Mots-Cles: mondialisation; politique ELT; asiatique; etude comparative

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicMultilingual Education and PolicyFrench-language works237,207