MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963508956 · doi:10.1353/ccj.2006.0019

Obstacles a la surveillance du systeme penal en pays andins: l'exemple bolivien

2006· article· en· W1963508956 on OpenAlex
Denis Langlois

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Penology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A brief tour of a few penitentiaries in the Andean region of South America brings out the stark contrast between the well-equipped prisons of Canada, the United States, and Europe and the generally run-down facilities to which prisoners in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru are subjected. Despite constitutional and legislative provisions in line with international law, prisoners in these countries sometimes face inhumane conditions and multiple violations of their most basic human rights. In such a context, opportunities for any real monitoring of the correctional system come up against major structural shortcomings. That being said, the work of public institutions such as the Defensor del Pueblo (Ombudsman) helps to mitigate the ongoing arbitrariness of penitentiary administration. In addition, the fact that there are constitutional tribunals and that agencies such as the Defensor del Pueblo and NGOs can seek help from international prisoners' rights bodies strengthens actual recognition of those rights. The author hopes that the implementation of national action plans will prompt the governments concerned to meet their obligations regarding prisoners' rights. Une simple visite de quelques centres p�nitentiaires de la r�gion andine convainc tout observateur de la diff�rence marquante entre la prison �quip�e que nous connaissons au Canada, aux � tats-Unis ou en Europe et celle trop souvent v�tuste que doivent supporter les personnes d�tenues de Bolivie, de Colombie, d'� quateur ou du P�rou. Malgr� l'existence d'un cadre constitutionnel et l�gislatif conforme au droit international, les prisonniers de ces pays font face � des conditions de d�tention parfois infrahumaines et subissent nombre de violations � leurs droits les plus �l�mentaires. Dans ce contexte, les possibilit�s effectives de surveillance du syst�me p�nal se heurtent � des d�ficiences structurelles importantes. Cependant, l'action d'institutions publiques telles le Defensor del Pueblo contribue � att�nuer la part d'arbitraire toujours existante dans la gestion de ces p�nitenciers. L'existence de tribunaux constitutionnels ainsi que le recours par les institutions publiques comme le Defensor del Pueblo et les organisations non-gouvernementales (ONG) � des instances internationales de protection des droits des personnes d�tenues renforce �galement la reconnaissance effective de ces meömes droits. Il est permis d'esp�rer que la mise en oeuvre de plans d'action nationaux entraõöne les � tats concern�s � s'acquitter de leurs obligations en mati�re de droits des personnes sous la responsabilit� du syst�me p�nal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it