Three-Dimensional Permeability Utilizing a New Gas-Spot Permeameter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Permeability, a major reservoir property that reservoir engineers strive to measure as accurately as possible, is nevertheless always measured indirectly, by estimation, either through well-testing or specific logging tools and techniques. Permeability measurement utilizing reservoir rock samples does not necessarily guarantee accurate results, as fluid saturation of rock samples may change dramatically due to stresses and pore pressure changes take place during coring and transportation of samples to the laboratory for testing. In attempting to extrapolate fluid flow behavior in the reservoir from such samples, tremendous efforts have been directed up to now towards producing useful meanings of horizontal, vertical and directional permeabilities. This paper introduces a new permeability measurement approach that brings fresh understanding to reservoir permeability and a truer reflection of fluid flow behavior around producing wells. The traditional use of horizontal, vertical and directional permeabilities to reflect the conductivity of a formation to fluid flow is often misleading. Actually, the flow comes from everywhere in the reservoir and reduces to the wellbore, and in many cases ended at the perforations. The flow pattern takes a shape of a cone where the base is at the boundary and the head is at the wellbore or the perforation opening. This flow pattern produces a conical or "tapering" permeability. This new 3-D permeability term should enhance the accuracy of the models used to represent fluid flow in porous media. A three-dimensional permeability term is newly introduced here. A three-dimensional spot gas permeameter device and techniques for measuring this term have been constructed in the laboratory. This device is intended to enable direct measurement of gas permeability at any spot on the surface of the sample, regardless of sample shape or size. The issues of probe sealing and gas slippage have been resolved by introduction of a rubber baker at the tip of the probe, and by allowing low-pressure injection. A new mathematical model has been derived to describe the flow pattern associated with measuring gas permeability using the proposed device. The proposed mathematical model along with numerical solution presented is expected to find application beyond the gas permeameter case, as its usefulness is proven more relevant to reservoir behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".