MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963617785 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2010.5537106

An interconnect-aware Dynamic Voltage Scaling scheme for DSM VLSI

2010· article· en· W1963617785 on OpenAlexaff
Houman Zarrabi, A.J. Al-Khalili, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVery-large-scale integrationComputer scienceInterconnectionScheme (mathematics)ScalingDynamic voltage scalingVoltageElectronic engineeringComputer architectureParallel computingEmbedded systemElectrical engineeringComputer networkEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic Voltage Scaling (DVS) is a successful design solution that addresses the challenges associated with low-power/energy and high-performance design in Deep Sub Micron (DSM) CMOS. In DSM, VLSI systems have become interconnect-centric; correspondingly, the associated design solutions should be adapted to preserve their functionality. In reference to this concern, and with respect to DVS, we propose a DVS scheme that takes interconnect effects into account. The proposed DVS scheme is a generalization of existing methods that treat systems as pure logic. To support this DVS scheme, two design metrics are introduced. These metrics model the performance of system components subject to DVS, based on the proportion of their delay due to interconnects. Based on the proposed design metrics, a compact delay model and a method for supply voltage selection are proposed. The limit of scaling for hazard-free system operation in VLSI systems is further formulated. It is shown that this limit can be smaller than the one dictated by the process technology. The proposed DVS scheme is applied to a 4-section global clock distribution network. Reported results show that this scheme improves both the timing accuracy and energy consumption aspects of DVS by 25% and 30% on average, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.891

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207