Dramatic Rate Enhancement with Preservation of Stereospecificity in the First Metal-Catalyzed Additions of Allylboronates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This communication successfully challenges the perception that the additions of allylbonates to aldehydes cannot be catalyzed effectively by added Lewis acids. Using a novel class of isomerically pure, tetrasubstituted 2-alkoxycarbonyl allylboronates (1), we describe that some metals (for example, Sc(OTf)(3) and Cu(OTf)(2)) allow these reagents to add onto aldehydes to yield gamma-lactone products 2 in good yields at temperatures almost 100 degrees C lower than the corresponding uncatalyzed reactions. The large rate enhancement over the uncatalyzed reaction provides a highly improved practical approach to access aldol-like adducts with a stereogenic quaternary carbon center. The crucial role of the 2-alkoxycarbonyl group on allylboronates 1 was demonstrated with control experiments using a model allylboronate lacking such an ester group. Moreover, the stereospecificity observed in the uncatalyzed allylborations is preserved. These observations raise intriguing mechanistic issues such as the suggestion that type I allylmetal behavior is maintained in this unprecedented catalytic reaction manifold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".