MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963681807 · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3757

Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic and prostaglandin treatments for uterine health and reproductive performance in dairy cows

2011· article· en· W1963681807 on OpenAlexaff
J. Dubuc, T.F. Duffield, K.E. Leslie, J.S. Walton, S.J. LeBlanc

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersPfizerCrohn's and Colitis Foundation of America
KeywordsMetritisEndometritisMedicineRetained placentaVaginal dischargeHerdGynecologyRandomized controlled trialObstetricsDairy cattleCervicitisPregnancyIce calvingAnimal scienceInternal medicineLactationVeterinary medicinePlacentaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy of antibiotic treatment for preventing postpartum uterine disease among cows at high risk of uterine disease, and to assess the efficacy of PGF(2α) for treating cytological endometritis (CYTO) and purulent vaginal discharge (PVD). A total of 2,178 Holstein cows in 6 herds were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Within 24h after parturition, cows were classified at being at high risk of uterine disease (HRUD; n=1,017) if they had twins, dystocia, or retained placenta. All remaining cows were classified as being at low risk of uterine disease (LRUD; n=1,161). Cows in the HRUD group were randomly allocated in a factorial design to receive ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA) at 24h after parturition or be untreated, and to receive dinoprost (PGF(2α)) at 35 and 49 (±3) days in milk (DIM) or to be untreated. Cows in LRUD were randomly allocated to receive PGF(2α) at 35 and 49 (±3) DIM or to be untreated. Serum progesterone was measured at 21, 35, 49, and 63 (±3) DIM. Cows were examined at 35 (±3; exam 1) and 56 (±3; exam 2) DIM for CYTO (by cytobrush device; ≥6% polymorphonuclear cells in endometrial cytology) and for PVD (by Metricheck device; mucopurulent or purulent vaginal discharge). Statistical analyses were performed using multivariable logistic regression models accounting for herd clustering. Treatment with CCFA in HRUD cows was not associated with the probability of metritis overall, but interactions occurred such that CCFA decreased the incidence of metritis among HRUD cows that did not have retained placenta and among cows of parity ≥2. Treatment with CCFA in HRUD cows decreased the probability of PVD at exam 1. Treatment with PGF(2α) did not affect the probability of cure of CYTO or PVD irrespective of progesterone concentration at the time of treatment. Among cows affected by CYTO or PVD at exam 1, 66 and 63%, respectively, had spontaneously cured at exam 2. Cows persistently affected at exam 2 had an increased time to pregnancy and were more likely to have both CYTO and PVD at exam 1. Administration of PGF(2α) at both 5 and 7 wk postpartum did not mitigate the effects of CYTO or PVD on reproductive performance. Clinical approaches to treatment of chronic postpartum reproductive tract infection and inflammation should be reassessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations144
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207