Quantitative Echocardiographic Assessment of Regional Wall Motion and Left Ventricular Asynchrony with Color Kinesis in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Conventional echocardiographic interpretation of regional wall motion abnormalities is subjective and experience dependent. Delayed contraction in the ejection phase (tardokinesis) and regional systolic asynchrony, sensitive markers of myocardial ischemia, cannot be accurately assessed visually. We used color kinesis (CK), a technique that evaluates spatiotemporal patterns of endocardial motion, to objectively detect regional wall motion abnormalities in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, and we compared it with conventional assessment of grayscale images by less experienced reviewers; we used expert grading as the gold standard for comparisons. Quantitative CK analysis agreed more closely with expert grading than less experienced reviewers (kappa coefficients, 0.74 versus 0.52 and 0.5). Global tardokinesis, identified in 9 of 26 patients (2 with normal fractional area change), was associated with an increased index of systolic asynchrony. Regional tardokinesis was identified in 48 of 150 segments: 27 segments had a normal magnitude of wall motion, 18 were hypokinetic, and 3 were severely hypokinetic/akinetic. Mildly hypokinetic segments showed delayed systolic motion, whereas residual motion of severely hypokinetic/akinetic segments occurred in early systole, reflecting passive effects produced by adjacent myocardial contraction. Quantitative CK may be a useful supplement to visual assessment, particularly for less experienced readers. By diagnosing tardokinesis, common among cardiac surgical patients even with normal standard ejection phase indices, quantitative CK may improve the intraoperative detection of regional ischemic changes. IMPLICATIONS: Quantitative color kinesis allows for objective and sensitive intraoperative echocardiographic assessment of abnormal spatial and temporal patterns of regional ventricular wall motion, with potentially important implications for improving myocardial ischemia detection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".