The Expression of Multiple Connexins Throughout Spermatogenesis in the Rainbow Trout Testis Suggests a Role for Complex Intercellular Communication1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Certain fish, such as rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), are seasonal breeders. Spermatogenesis in rainbow trout is synchronous; therefore, at any time point during this process, germ cells are predominantly at the same stage of development. As such, rainbow trout represent an excellent model in which to study spermatogenesis. Gap junctions are composed of connexons, which are themselves formed by six transmembrane proteins termed connexins (Cxs). The objectives of this study were to assess which Cxs are expressed in the rainbow trout testis, and if their expression was stage specific during gonadal maturation. Rainbow trout were killed at various stages of maturation, and total cellular RNA was isolated from the testes. RT-PCR using degenerate primers recognizing all vertebrate Cxs indicates that there are several different Cxs in trout testes. Amplicons were cloned and sequenced. Homology comparisons indicate that these were cx43, cx43.4, cx31, and cx30. Immunolocalization of these Cxs indicate that Cx43 was localized primarily to Sertoli cells, while Cx43.4 was localized along the lateral plasma membranes between adjacent spermatocytes. Cx30 was localized to the interstitial Leydig cells, and Cx31 was localized primarily to the endothelium of interstitial blood vessels. The expression of each Cx varied as a function of the stage of spermatogenesis, suggesting that the expression of these proteins is highly regulated. Together, these results indicate that intercellular communication in the testis is complex, involves several different Cxs, and is a highly regulated process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".