Valence bond calculations on the transition state for the E2 reaction of fluoride ion with ethyl fluoride Implications for the More O'Ferrall Jencks diagram
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A valence bond self-consistent field (VBSCF) calculation has been carried out on the bimolecular elimination (E2) reaction of fluoride ion with ethyl fluoride. The transition state was first optimized at HF/6-31+G and the resulting orbitals were used in the VBSCF calculation. A transition-state hybrid consisting of four structures (F H-CH 2 -CH 2 -F, F-HCH 2 =CH 2 F , F-H CH 2 -CH 2 -F, and F H-CH 2 -CH 2 + F ) failed to give a reasonable energy. Incorporation of four charge-separated structures (F H + CH 2 -CH 2 -F, F H + CH 2 -CH 2 + F , F H + CH 2 =CH 2 F , and F-H CH 2 -CH 2 + F ) for a total of eight resulted in an energy slightly below HartreeFock. A full-space VBSCF calculation utilizing 50 structures showed that the eight structures give a sufficiently accurate wave function. The transition state is dominated by charge-separated structures, leading to a greater degree of charge separation than in either the reactant or product complex. Therefore, the transition state does not evolve synchronously from the reactants, and explicit allowance should be made for this fact when applying descriptions of the reaction path, such as that in the More O'Ferrall Jencks diagram. Key words: elimination reaction, E2, transition state, VBSCF calculation, XMVB programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".