MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963775527 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2013.2252651

On the Modeling and Linearization of a Concurrent Dual-Band Transmitter Exhibiting Nonlinear Distortion and Hardware Impairments

2013· article· en· W1963775527 on OpenAlexafffund
Mayada Younes, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsPredistortionMulti-band deviceLinearizationAmplifierNonlinear systemElectronic engineeringComputer scienceNonlinear distortionTransmitterAdjacent channelEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsCMOSTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel, complexity-reduced, dual-input, two-box model for the modeling and digital predistortion of a dual-band power amplifier (PA) in the presence of in-phase/quadrature (I/Q) modulator imperfections. The model is composed of two cascaded nonlinear blocks. The first block is implemented as a mildly nonlinear dual-input truncated Volterra filter, which includes second-order cross-terms for the mutual characterization of the dynamic mildly nonlinear memory effects exhibited by the dual-band PA and for the compensation of I/Q imperfections. The second block is implemented as a two-dimensional look-up table for the characterization of the static nonlinearity of the dual-band PA. The proposed model was evaluated through the excitation of the dual-band Doherty PA by two concurrent multi-carrier signals, applied at 880 MHz and 1978 GHz, in the presence of I/Q modulator imperfections. The experimental results showed the accurate performance of the proposed model in suppressing the adjacent channel error power, when compared to other state-of-the-art models, the computational complexity of the proposed model was significantly reduced, which economizes the resources utilized by the model for implementation on a digital signal processing/field-programmable gate array platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207