MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963788446 · doi:10.1121/1.4779512

Laser ultrasonic system for on-line steel tube gauging and process control

2002· article· en· W1963788446 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Lévesque, M. Choquet, Christian Padioleau, C. Néron, Christian Corbeil, Richard Talbot, Abdelhakim Bendada, Jean‐Pierre Monchalin, Robert V. Kolarik, Gerald V. Jeskey, Erich D. Dominik, Larry J. Duly, Kenneth J. Samblanet, Steven E. Agger, Kenneth J. Roush, Michael L. Mester

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandrelLaserMaterials scienceOpticsTube (container)Ultrasonic sensorOptical fiberInterferometryPyrometerAcousticsTemperature measurementPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A laser ultrasonic system has been installed on a seamless tubing production line at The Timken Company and is being used to measure on-line the wall thickness of tubes during processing. The seamless process consists essentially in forcing a mandrel through a hot cylindrical billet in rotation and results in wall thickness variations that should be minimized and controlled to respect specifications. The system includes a Q-switched Nd-YAG laser for the generation of ultrasound by ablation, a long pulse very stable Nd-YAG laser for detection coupled to a confocal Fabry–Perot interferometer. The lasers, data acquisition, and processing units are housed in a cabin off-line and connected to a front coupling head located over the passing tube by optical fibers. The system also includes a fiber-coupled pyrometer to measure tube temperature profile and two fiber-coupled optical velocimeters to measure the coordinates at the probing location on the surface of the passing, rotating hot tube. During the presentation further details of the system will be disclosed, as well as typical results and examples of its diagnostic capability. [Work partially supported by Department of Energy under Award No. DE-FC07-99ID 13651.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicFlow Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207