The Social Eudemonia of Immigrants in ‘The New World’: A Critique of Michael Ondaatje's<i>In the Skin of a Lion</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The process of colonisation has brought about several changes in the socio-cultural condition of the colonised countries as the imperialistic policy of waging wars against the third-world countries induced millions of people to migrate from their homeland to distant lands. In the novel ‘In the Skin of a Lion’, Ondaatje traces the inception of the process of migration to Canada and explicates the condition that leads to the multicultural social and cultural scenario of Canada. Moreover, he portrays the bourgeois tendency of colonisers who utilised the manual labour of the migrants and rarely provided suitable living and working conditions. This article has made a scrupulous study on the interconnection between the socio-cultural condition and the identity of an individual. This study claims that as the stable self represents the psychological wellbeing, individuals should strive hard to maintain their mental health and thereby play a significant role in the social development of the country. Ondaatje insists the government of the countries to acknowledge the contributions of all races and afford healthy living conditions to foster social eudemonia of the immigrants in ‘the new world’. He believes that the discouragement of ghettoisation, violence and racial discrimination would create endearing circumstances for the peaceful coexistence of various cultural groups. He affirms the need for the insistence on the value and dignity of all people regardless of their racial or ethnic origins, language or their religious affiliation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".