Practical hysteresis model for magnetorheological dampers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The magnetorheological dampers have been extensively studied given their benefits such as fail-safe manner, low power requirements, relative fast response, and large force capacity and robustness. To take advantage of this remarkable device, a good model is required to accurately and effectively predict the real-time damping force in magnetorheological damper in order to apply the appropriate control actions to improve the response of the structural system. In this article, a new practical model is proposed to better characterize the hysteresis phenomenon in magnetorheological dampers. The model considers the displacement, velocity, and acceleration excitations as well as the current excitation as input variables and includes a reduced number of constant parameters to be determined. Since the displacement, velocity, and acceleration variables can be obtained in real time from adequate sensors, it is easy and practical to predict the current excitation required to generate the specific hysteresis force. The hysteresis damping forces predicted by the proposed model are validated with those experimentally obtained for different current, amplitude, and frequency of excitation, and a very good correlation has been observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it