MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963870815 · doi:10.4000/anabases.4373

Le centenaire du Catalogue des sculptures du Musée de Constantinople de Gustave Mendel (1912-1914)

2013· article· fr· W1963870815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnabases · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtSculptureHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ALORS QUE TOUTE UNE SRIE DE MANIFESTATIONS et publications scientifiques est en prparation pour commmorer le prochain et triste centenaire du Premier conflit mondial, il n'est pas inutile de s'attarder sur les belles ralisations culturelles de l'avantguerre. Parmi celles-ci figure le Catalogue des sculptures grecques, romaines et byzantines des Muses impriaux, ralis par Gustave Mendel et paru Constantinople en trois volumes entre 1912 et 1914, qui reste encore aujourd'hui l'ouvrage de rfrence pour l'tude de la sculpture antique venue de tout l'Empire ottoman et conserve au muse archologique d'Istanbul. Outre son intrt intrinsque, cette publication comporte de nombreuses particularits : une volont manifeste de l'inscrire dans la longue dure par des notices rudites et illustres ; la collaboration franco-turque qui voit ainsi un auteur franais valoriser le patrimoine de l'Asie Mineure et une institution turque ; le tout dans un contexte de transformation du monde oriental, et de rivalits occidentales en action sur le terrain asiatique travers la pratique de l'archologie 1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it