MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963896679 · doi:10.1021/es000888r

Micromachined Electrophoresis Chips with Electrochemical Detectors for Analysis of Explosive Compounds in Soil and Groundwater

2000· article· en· W1963896679 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelkader Hilmi, John H. T. Luong

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExplosive materialCapillary electrophoresisAmperometryTrinitrotolueneDetection limitMicrosystemElectrophoresisElectrodeContaminationWorking electrodeChromatographyMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryElectrochemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A capillary electrophoresis (CE) microsystem with amperometric detection has been developed to form a reusable, sensitive, and low-cost analytical device. As part of an electrochemical detection system, the working gold electrode was inserted into a specially designed detection cell, with its sensing area positioned just outside the separation channel outlet to provide high-sensitivity detection with negligible interferences from the separation electric field. Electrophoretic separations of trinitrotoluene (TNT) and four other nitroaromatic explosives in under 4 min with detection limits of 100−200 μg/L demonstrated the good resolution as well as sensitivity of the CE microchip. The system was applicable for analysis of the explosive content of soil extracts and groundwater, yielding results in good agreement with the standard procedure. This truly reusable detection system is particularly useful for several applications that require frequent surface cleaning or electrode replacement due to severe surface poisoning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207