MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963900110 · doi:10.1592/phco.21.5.513.34501

Colestipol‐Induced Hepatotoxicity

2001· article· en· W1963900110 on OpenAlexaff
Susan M. Sirmans, Joni Beck, Hoan Linh Banh, Dale A. Freeman

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterologyAsymptomaticBile acidDyslipidemiaTransaminaseInternal medicineLiver function testsLiver functionElevated transaminasesHepatic functionLiver damageAlanine transaminaseChemistryBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 65-year-old man with type IIa dyslipidemia who received flavored colestipol granules 2 scoops/day for 3 months developed asymptomatic hepatotoxicity. Several of his liver enzymes were elevated 10 times the upper limit of normal. One week after discontinuing colestipol, serum transaminases fell dramatically, with some returning to normal limits. Four weeks after colestipol was discontinued, all liver function tests were normal. Rechallenge was not attempted. Other potential causes of hepatocellular injury were evaluated. Bile acid-binding resins commonly are administered to treat type IIa dyslipidemia. Despite extensive use of the resins, significant elevations of transaminase levels are rare. Because the exact mechanism of bile acid resin-induced hepatotoxicity is unknown, high-risk patients may require liver function test monitoring and education on hepatotoxic side effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapySame topicDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207