The effects of irradiation intensity on the microwave-enhanced advanced oxidation process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The microwave enhanced advanced oxidation process (MW/H(2)O(2)-AOP) was adopted in successfully treating a multitude of organic slurries. The factor of ramp rate was incorporated in this study to investigate its correlations with different nutrients release into solution from waste activated sludge. Besides the ramp rate, the amount of time the samples were held at the treatment temperature to a total of 10 minutes aided in the isolation of held temperature from ramp rates, since different ramp rates will yield different reaction times. It was found that with the exception of orthophosphate and chemical oxygen demand release, ammonia and volatile fatty acids depended highly on the ramp rates. All constituents, chemical oxygen demand, orthophosphate, ammonia and volatile fatty acids, solubilized better with longer reaction times coupled with the highest ramp rate. Besides treatment time and ramp rates, treatment temperature and hydrogen peroxide dosage also play important roles in the release of various nutrients into solution by the MW/H(2)O(2)-AOP. The results from this study can aid in design parameters for the scaling up of a continuous microwave system for the MW/H(2)O(2)-AOP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".