Topical Tacrolimus: A Review of Its Uses in Dermatology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tacrolimus is one of the newer immunosuppressants that act by inhibiting T-cell activation and cytokine release. It is approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, and its safety and efficacy have been extensively studied in large-scale randomized controlled trials and open-label studies worldwide involving over 12,000 patients and up to 3 years of follow-up. Since its introduction, anecdotal reports and case series have found topical tacrolimus also to be effective and well tolerated in patients with a variety of other skin disorders, including other types of eczema, papulosquamous disorders, disorders of cornification, rosacea, other inflammatory skin conditions, vesiculobullous diseases, vitiligo, connective-tissue diseases, graft-versus-host disease, and follicular disorders. This paper reviews the currently available evidence on the use of topical tacrolimus for these conditions, as well as its safety profile and cost-effectiveness. Tacrolimus does appear to offer a safe and efficacious alternative that minimizes the need for topical glucocorticoids and does not cause skin atrophy. However, the risk of systemic absorption is increased with generalized disruption of the skin barrier. Further large-scale studies are needed to clarify the efficacy of topical tacrolimus in a variety of conditions for which anecdotal reports of success exist, especially in regard to different racial groups and in comparison to (as well as in combination with) other existing therapies. Long-term safety data should continue to be monitored and reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".